|
Post by Arachis on Apr 6, 2004 23:07:03 GMT -5
only for an exorbitant fee... or for a 30 day trial you can have my services absolutely free. Then there is also the demo version, which has limited abilities but at a lower cost. Call toll free (for Los Altans/Mountainviewers/Palo Altans only) at 792-1717 for more information (my number is scrambled for all those with malicious intent and no actual interest in product. Those with any interest should be able to find it out relatively quickly, either through contacts on the forum, or just a phone book... anybody unable to do this can pm me.... at well, Aenarion@paveltc.proboards12.com.... that would be my guess at least.)
|
|
|
Post by Archagon on Apr 6, 2004 23:37:03 GMT -5
Muahaha...I will use a keygenerator and pirate you!
|
|
|
Post by Arachis on Apr 7, 2004 8:56:15 GMT -5
NOOOOOOO
You evil pirate..... I will bring the full weight of US court against you and other perpetrators!
|
|
|
Post by KillinKrillan on Apr 7, 2004 12:47:32 GMT -5
NOOOOOOO You evil pirate..... I will bring the full weight of US court against you and other perpetrators! I would suggest not buying services from this individual. He never ended his first sentence, and put too many periods.
Is this the kind of man you want in charge of your work for school or to be published?
Say no to Aenarion. Vote no on prop 214.
|
|
|
Post by Arachis on Apr 7, 2004 16:56:14 GMT -5
Ha! Shows what you know! I will use the same method of critique I previously used. I will start at the top, end at the bottom.
First you advise people not to buy my services. However, what need have they to listen to you? I offer them a 30 day trial for free. They dont need to buy my services if they find them lacking in the 30 day trial. As a result, I would advise them not to listen to you, but instead to use the trial for 30 days before buying my services.
Then you go on to accuse me of not ending my first sentance. I did end my first sentance. I didnt end my first exclamation with the proper punctuation though. If you are to critique me, critique me properly.
Then you go on to tell me I used to many full stops. however it is well known that in using more than one period, an ellipse is formed, which is a manner of showing that the sentance trails off, and is therefore not supposed to end. In this way I am expressing through my writing instructions for how it is to be read, and therefore what it is supposed to express.
Furthermore, I will not be in charge of the persons work as you claim. Instead I will only provide the person with critiques, and they can choose the corrections they want to make. The customer has the final word in my business (except where restrictions apply. See pg. 237 of Contract).
In another mistake, you somehow associate me, my business, or the name Aenarion to proposition 214, of which I have absolutely no connection. How you could have mistaken the restrictions placed on health care by the government as being related to me I do not know.
My final word is that not only do you insult me, put down my business and in general, publish horrible libel. But you write in such a manner as to betray your own ignorance on the matter, and to prove that you, in fact, have no authority to write such words. This is further proved by the smiley faces which you use, and only disgrace your work with useless bland artwork, that attempts to draw the reader away from the mistakes you made in your critique!
|
|
|
Post by KillinKrillan on Apr 7, 2004 18:10:55 GMT -5
however it is well known that in using more than one period, an ellipse is formed, which is a manner of showing that the sentance trails off, and is therefore not supposed to end. You failed to use correct puncuation again. I do believe that it should be 'However' not 'however'.
|
|
|
Post by Arachis on Apr 7, 2004 22:16:43 GMT -5
Of course I am writing long discourses, so it is natural for me to have a few errors. When you write in small short sentances, you should have many less errors. However, In my whole critique you found only one error. Whereas I found many more in your previous post, and find one more in this one. When you correct me, at least make sure that you do not commit a similar error for you too made a grammatical mistake. Although it was legitimite to have put "'However'" in single quotation marks in order to denote it being a noun rather than the meaning it usually has, your second reference should have been in double quotation marks because it is a direct quote from my post.
In general, try to prevent hypocrisy and self-embarrasment by refraining to correct my posts. However, do not interpret that as though I were trying to censor you, and therefore make myself look more perfect than I am. No, I am in fact looking out for you. I would reccomend that instead, you PM me with corrections, for I too can make mistakes (although it is a rare occurence). This would help prevent both of us losing face in front of other people. However it is up to you, and if you are able to perfect your writing to the extent that you can correct me, and I will have no defense or counter attack, then in that case disregard the above advice. All in all, improve your own grammar, or dont improve mine ( or at least not publicly and with a dissaproving tone.)
|
|
|
Post by henry on Apr 7, 2004 22:32:42 GMT -5
chatlog that sums up my thoughts on this thread: Paveltc: hey dude, have you seen this thread paveltc.proboards12.com/index.cgi?board=forumdisc&action=display&thread=1078613408&start=15 Paveltc: where ali starts going off on long ramblings about nothing henrystanleyFDZF: k henrystanleyFDZF: what...the...[expletive] Paveltc: tht thread? henrystanleyFDZF: best part right here: henrystanleyFDZF: a matyter of time (which I will decipher as being martyr since you cant really be a matter of time, only matter in time..... since time is a dimension in which matter exists) And why is this "it" a martyr of time... Did it die to save a dimension? Paveltc: er Paveltc: did you reply to it? henrystanleyFDZF: nope henrystanleyFDZF: man i can't even make sense of it henrystanleyFDZF: oh wait
|
|
|
Post by KillinKrillan on Apr 7, 2004 22:32:57 GMT -5
When you write in small short sentances, you should have many less errors. Very good. Yet I still manage to find one error. It should be 'sentences' not "sentances".
I would provide this information inside a PM for you, but how could we deny the public this clash of trying to best each other at proper grammar? I'm sure they find it most interesting, and we all have the chance to learn something from this.
|
|
|
Post by henry on Apr 7, 2004 22:36:00 GMT -5
When you write in small short sentances, you should have many less errors. No no - when you write in small , short sentences, you should have far fewer errors.
|
|
|
Post by Paveltc on Apr 7, 2004 22:37:51 GMT -5
Furthermore, I will not be in charge of the persons work as you claim. Instead I will only provide the person with critiques, and they can choose the corrections they want to make. The customer has the final word in my business (except where restrictions apply. See pg. 237 of Contract). Please present proof that this pg. 237 exists as well as the other 236 pages before it.
|
|
|
Post by Arachis on Apr 7, 2004 22:41:56 GMT -5
You speak as one who knows little. The word 'sentance' can be spelled in many ways. Although it is true that Americans commonly spell it with an 'e', the British and Australians often spell it with an 'a'. As a result it is legitimate both ways.
Then in your second post, you base your argument on the fact that other forum-goers (yes I made that word up) gain entertainment from this. However Henry, in the previous post explicitly demonstrates that he does not even understand it, more or less gain pleasure in reading it. I quote "man i can't even make sense of it." In general, the only people, whom I can discern, are gaining entertainment from this debate, would be you and I.
|
|
|
Post by Arachis on Apr 7, 2004 22:44:23 GMT -5
No no - when you write in small , short sentences, you should have far fewer errors. You can express yourself either way. And to you, Pavel, would you like me to send you all 237 pages of the contract I have drawn up?
|
|
|
Post by Paveltc on Apr 7, 2004 22:47:03 GMT -5
Yes please. I would like to see this contract.
|
|
|
Post by henry on Apr 7, 2004 22:47:57 GMT -5
No you can't.
Fewer refers to a quantity. (Jimmy has snorted fewer lines of coke than Johnny has.)
Less refers to a degree. (Jimmy is less of a man than Johnny.)
p.s. i thoroughly enjoyed your post at the end of the last page.
|
|