|
Post by Arachis on Feb 7, 2005 23:55:08 GMT -5
Ok.. fine. Im not the people's choice moderator but whats a little false advertising here or there? Im my choice for moderator and so far thats about it, since I havent polled anybody else. For once, I wont ramble on about all the things I will do, because frankly Im tired, and wont do anything new or exciting, wont revolutionize the forum, and wont mudsling the other competitiors. Instead, Ill be your boring old candidate #2, who will: - be online, - censor in the rare case that somebody is extremeley vulgar, mean, or any of the other cases that need censoring, -partake in Modly activities, -keep on updating the news (which I have seen has lately been updated, a lot of the junk in it having been deleted) -and run the forum with my comods...
A Vote for me is a vote for mediocracy....
(If theres one thing that hasnt changed its my pathetic campaighn slogans)
|
|
|
Post by bezzerkker on Feb 8, 2005 21:45:11 GMT -5
I think the spelling of the word "campaighn" has changed, though.
Your title almost made you sound communist, and America has a long history of what it does to Commies....
|
|
|
Post by Arachis on Feb 9, 2005 1:23:41 GMT -5
Pfff... We all know that Mcarthy was the communist, and the whole scare was just a tactic for him to gain popularity. Anyway. The internet is communist, so like it or not, America is half communist (since half of all America is stored on the internet). Anyway, it doesnt matter because Im not communist.
And Im not the peoples choice moderator.
And I spell Campaighn how I want to spell it. Word has given me trouble with that word, so I added it to the dictionary. Get your own "add to dictionary" command and things will work out.
|
|
|
Post by Haku on Feb 9, 2005 1:31:42 GMT -5
But how does your English teacher respond to that Ali?
|
|
|
Post by Arachis on Feb 9, 2005 2:16:40 GMT -5
like he cares about a single spelling error when there are so many others he can choose from.
|
|
|
Post by bezzerkker on Feb 9, 2005 20:18:33 GMT -5
I've said it before and I'll say it again: "Peepul whoo spel thangz wun wai hav noe emajinashun"
|
|
|
Post by Arachis on Feb 9, 2005 21:03:39 GMT -5
ummm... thats completely contrary to the point. Since both of us have a different way of spelling it, but it is still only 1 way. None of us believe in multiple spellings of the word.
Vote for the one who spells Campaighn with that extra "h". I believe there should be an "h" in every "house" and "home".
|
|
|
Post by Monolith on Feb 9, 2005 21:28:15 GMT -5
ummm... thats completely contrary to the point. Since both of us have a different way of spelling it, but it is still only 1 way. None of us believe in multiple spellings of the word. Vote for the one who spells Campaighn with that extra "h". I believe there should be an "h" in every "house" and "home". That is so comunist. Damn you reds! I don't know why but damn you!
|
|
|
Post by Arachis on Feb 10, 2005 0:14:56 GMT -5
That is so comunist. d**n you reds! I don't know why but d**n you! wait... Im not Native American... why are you calling me red?!? YOU Rasist Capitalist PIG!!!! Oh.. Why are all capitalists pigs?
|
|
|
Post by Archagon on Feb 10, 2005 0:54:54 GMT -5
bcuz they r delicius
|
|
|
Post by Monolith on Feb 10, 2005 20:48:34 GMT -5
wait... Im not Native American... why are you calling me red?!? YOU Rasist Capitalist PIG!!!! Oh.. Why are all capitalists pigs? A better question would be, why are all pigs capitalist?
|
|
|
Post by bezzerkker on Feb 10, 2005 21:04:39 GMT -5
No no no no no! Pigs are communist! Haven't any of you read "Animal Farm"?!
|
|
|
Post by BlueDolphin on Feb 10, 2005 21:12:59 GMT -5
and pretty tyrannical too...
Why are imperialists dogs?
|
|
|
Post by bezzerkker on Feb 10, 2005 22:43:34 GMT -5
Because Imperialists want loyalty towards their master (i.e. the emperor, king, queen, etc) and dogs are known for their loyalty.
wait, that makes too much sense! I'll try it again
Because both of them slobber senselessly and wag their tails when happy!
|
|
|
Post by Arachis on Feb 11, 2005 0:25:29 GMT -5
Because Imperialists want loyalty towards their master (i.e. the emperor, king, queen, etc) and dogs are known for their loyalty. wait, that makes too much sense! Wait! I disagree! Imperialists dont want loyalty towards their master. Imperialists are about colonization and domination of primitive or backward countries. A more logical connection would have to do with dogs marking their territory by peeing. Sort of like Imperialists whose territory is marked by the places where peaceful tribes of natives were massacred. The most probable reason for the expression is probably because it just sounds good. I mean come on... "You Imperialist ant!" just sounds ridiculous.
|
|