|
Post by geneva on Jan 26, 2004 23:35:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Archagon on Jan 26, 2004 23:37:10 GMT -5
Wow. I must say, your art is getting better and better. The shading is very nice.
|
|
|
Post by henry on Jan 27, 2004 0:04:21 GMT -5
That is one extremely sexy man.
I applaud you.
|
|
|
Post by geneva on Jan 27, 2004 15:18:20 GMT -5
;D
good cause he was supposed to be sexy. was part of the request
|
|
|
Post by Dark Angel on Jan 27, 2004 22:17:48 GMT -5
Very nice play of shadow and light ^^
|
|
|
Post by AZERTY on Feb 1, 2004 14:43:50 GMT -5
yeah definitaly well done... how did you do the light, did you do a white gradient on a transparent layer, then lower the opacity?, and finally cut it into shapes? or did you use filters...
|
|
|
Post by AZERTY on Feb 1, 2004 14:44:41 GMT -5
also i like the use of texture... very nice
|
|
|
Post by geneva on Feb 1, 2004 20:05:20 GMT -5
I cut it into shapes and THEn i used gradients...
|
|
|
Post by AZERTY on Feb 3, 2004 22:35:18 GMT -5
well... wouldnt it be easier the other way? that way it could be more uniform... o wait its not supposed to be uniform.... (btw I meant uniform in the length.... but still...) nm I understand now.
|
|
|
Post by geneva on Feb 4, 2004 0:09:40 GMT -5
so long as we have an understanding....
|
|
|
Post by AZERTY on Feb 4, 2004 0:26:53 GMT -5
I always seek to understand.... other than when I seek to confuse...
|
|
|
Post by geneva on Feb 4, 2004 0:29:42 GMT -5
uh HUH.....
|
|
|
Post by AZERTY on Feb 4, 2004 0:30:04 GMT -5
the question is... do I understand in order to better conduse? or do I confuse, in order to better understand? Or am I trying to confuse you now by talking about confusing and understanding?
|
|
|
Post by geneva on Feb 4, 2004 0:30:53 GMT -5
so far i've understood you perfectly.... so if your goal is to confuse you've failed miserably
|
|
|
Post by AZERTY on Feb 4, 2004 0:33:56 GMT -5
but maybe I brought up the idea of confusion only to make it easier to understand?... in which case I succeeded
|
|