|
Post by musicalbabe on Sept 1, 2003 11:45:41 GMT -5
another good point. it's hard to say which 'part' of the music is the most essential or interesting. GOOD music requires there to be a balance of everything. i like your thinking.
|
|
|
Post by dietspam16 on Sept 1, 2003 11:50:50 GMT -5
tahnk you....and you know what? so do I!
|
|
|
Post by Dr.Quack on Sept 9, 2003 23:49:24 GMT -5
I still prefer the answer of instrumentation and orchestration, for I have seen great ideas die due to the lack of instrumental layering, and horrible ideas brought to great life through intensly ingenious orchestration.
Example #1 - Mussorgsky edition "Pictures at an Exhibition"
Example #2 - Shostakovich Symphony 4
|
|
|
Post by geneva on Sept 10, 2003 0:39:29 GMT -5
ya know... i'm trying to imagine any GOOD music that has only one of any the above things and still sounds good, and I'm failing horribly.
|
|
|
Post by flirtayangel on Sept 15, 2003 19:20:24 GMT -5
I'll agree with Geneva... I find it difficult to imagine pieces like that.
By the way, musical babe, I agree with you too, ALTO'S RULE! *grin* Okay, but I don't do the whole second thing, I much prefer getting straight viola parts which often harmonize with the violins.
~*~Me
|
|
|
Post by AZERTY on Sept 22, 2003 20:08:33 GMT -5
I think Thematic devlepment is also very important, it is a good way to tie the peice together and to make it seem coherent.
|
|