|
Post by Janus on Feb 26, 2003 22:32:38 GMT -5
Personally I view this as extremely obvious proof of one of two things. 1. Bush is a dumbass, or 2. there is something more behind his motives, such as oil. The reason I say that this could be because Bush big fucker is because there are far easier and more productive methods for removing a leader then going to war with THE ENTIRE COUNTRY. This is if Bush truly is doing this to remove Sadam Hussein. However, he very well could have other motives to doing such a thing. Perhaps this is a distraction from other issues he is unable to deal with, or even better, as he can quite obviously tell the the US can defeat Iraq in war, he sees it as an oppurtunity to game economic benefits post-war. What are your opinions?
Also, about Palestine vs. Israel, I watched a video on this topic. First, they showed a Israeli who claimed that he had right to live on land that was pretty much taken from Palestinians because of a RELIGOUSLY BASED belief that his ancestors lived in that land. My ancestors lived in Canada, so I therefore own that land......Right... Anyways the Palestinian man said that he was battling with the Israeli government because they were trying to take his land, and upon presentation of completely legal and in order forms saying that he owned the land he was living on, was told that the papers were not enough and they were not valid. He is probably still fighting for the land that sustains his family. Bluedolphin and spamlite (if he was paying attention) also saw this video. What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by Blues on Feb 26, 2003 23:17:37 GMT -5
yah! And also, he want to go dowen n history as a "strong" Prez.
|
|
|
Post by Janus on Feb 26, 2003 23:19:04 GMT -5
at this rate hes going down as the "wannabe" president
|
|
|
Post by Blues on Feb 27, 2003 0:10:19 GMT -5
yah, and the jackass who put us into war!! Woohoo!!
|
|
|
Post by Janus on Feb 27, 2003 0:17:46 GMT -5
anyone else have a view? bluedolphin? thesilence?
|
|
|
Post by Blues on Feb 27, 2003 0:24:48 GMT -5
they're too sacred of Big Bad Bush. lol
|
|
|
Post by Archagon on Feb 27, 2003 0:31:31 GMT -5
That's what I thought, until the interview with the Iraqi scientist, so there might be reason in this after all...
|
|
|
Post by henry on Feb 27, 2003 1:38:59 GMT -5
Yes, there is reason. Oil, I believe, is not especially high on the list of reasons. America has succesfully controlled Middle Eastern oil in the past by "being friendly" with leaders of oil-rich countries there (example: Saudi Arabia). War is a far less efficient method of controlling oil.
Ok, now back to the "clever" jabs at Bush.
|
|
|
Post by Archagon on Feb 27, 2003 1:53:32 GMT -5
I meant besides oil.
|
|
|
Post by henry on Feb 27, 2003 11:15:35 GMT -5
Of course - I'm just spouting off in general. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Janus on Feb 27, 2003 11:35:07 GMT -5
Whats this about an Iraqi scientest interview? pls, do tell
|
|
|
Post by Blues on Feb 27, 2003 19:46:53 GMT -5
Please kee the topic CLEAN!!
|
|
|
Post by henry on Mar 2, 2003 1:39:12 GMT -5
Come again?
|
|
|
Post by BlueDolphin on Mar 2, 2003 13:33:53 GMT -5
I also think that he maybe trying to get back on the unfinished business of his father's war in Iraq.
What I think is hypocritcal is how he says that diplomacy can deal with North Korea, but Iraq can only be dealt with by war.
|
|
|
Post by Salome on Mar 2, 2003 19:00:06 GMT -5
basicalluy u guyz agreed tahat bush is a hypocrite and a jackass, do u have anything new to add?
|
|