|
Post by henry on Jan 3, 2004 1:00:11 GMT -5
I'm running in the mod election to spite Alexei.
I mean, uh, I'm running because I want to lend a hand and give back to the community* that has given so much to me!
*leave naught but a smoldering pile of rubble and bovine excrement behind
So remember - a vote for me is a vote for relatively little!
|
|
|
Post by Dark Angel on Jan 3, 2004 2:18:05 GMT -5
You know, might want to create an account/log in just in case...
|
|
|
Post by henry on Jan 4, 2004 18:43:40 GMT -5
Done.
Now vote for me.
Or send negative votes for Alexei.
|
|
|
Post by Dark Angel on Jan 4, 2004 20:16:49 GMT -5
I imagine you either voted "not Alexei, not Alexei, and not Alexei" or "Henry, Henry, Henry"? ;D
|
|
|
Post by henry on Jan 4, 2004 20:36:59 GMT -5
Pavel wouldn't let me.
|
|
|
Post by Archagon on Jan 4, 2004 20:43:25 GMT -5
No comment.
|
|
|
Post by Dark Angel on Jan 4, 2004 21:34:07 GMT -5
Oh...I wasn't serious...okay then.... *pat pat*
|
|
|
Post by Archagon on Jan 4, 2004 21:38:19 GMT -5
Edit: no comment to Henry.
|
|
|
Post by Dark Angel on Jan 4, 2004 23:07:46 GMT -5
I was also talking to him ^^;
|
|
|
Post by henry on Jan 4, 2004 23:14:01 GMT -5
But Alexei, in saying "no comment," have you not indeed delivered a comment? You contradict yourself!
Can a man who makes such errors really be a fit moderator for this forum?
|
|
|
Post by Archagon on Jan 4, 2004 23:25:40 GMT -5
However, did I explicitly say that the "comment" was mine? Also, the statement "no comment" contains no verb, making the assumption that it denies comment invalid.
Is one who cannot make these simple deductions in the correct state of mind to argue against me?
|
|
|
Post by henry on Jan 4, 2004 23:49:53 GMT -5
However, did I explicitly say that the "comment" was mine? Also, the statement "no comment" contains no verb, making the assumption that it denies comment invalid. Is one who cannot make these simple deductions in the correct state of mind to argue against me? The "comment," bereft of any indication as to its sender, was assumed to be from the messenger (that's you). And, as the fragment "no comment" contained no verb, I was left with only two possible assumptions: that you forgot how to speak English, or that the verb was implied, as it usually is in casual speech lacking verbs. And I can make simple deductions. I just don't make them in the same maniacal, backward manner that you do. bla bla bla this dude is unfit yo
|
|
|
Post by Dark Angel on Jan 4, 2004 23:51:14 GMT -5
Grammar. The best topic for a debate of two candidates for a moderator. ;D
|
|
|
Post by henry on Jan 4, 2004 23:52:34 GMT -5
Nay!
The topic is not merely grammar, but also Alexei's blatant lack of competance*!
*may or may not be based upon his grammatical skills
|
|
|
Post by Archagon on Jan 4, 2004 23:59:43 GMT -5
The "comment," bereft of any indication as to its sender, was assumed to be from the messenger (that's you). And, as the fragment "no comment" contained no verb, I was left with only two possible assumptions: that you forgot how to speak English, or that the verb was implied, as it usually is in casual speech lacking verbs. And I can make simple deductions. I just don't make them in the same maniacal, backward manner that you do. bla bla bla this dude is unfit yo Assuptions are all too often found to be invalid, and making them is a sign of ignorant foolishness, unless there is no way to confirm the factual attributes of the assumption. Here, it was perfectly possible to question me and my motives, yet you refrained from doing so. You are correct in that I used "no comment" without a verb as is used casually. However, the verb, even if uncommon in most interpretations, could be different than "to be". Failure to bring to attention this fact is a sure sign of stupidity.
|
|