|
Post by Blues on Mar 4, 2006 14:43:45 GMT -5
now THAT.......I can dig.
|
|
|
Post by Monolith on Mar 7, 2006 18:03:12 GMT -5
Um, no. It's a pretty standard fighting game that aparently has some unique visuals. It's called 'rumble fish' after the Japanese Fighting Fish.
|
|
|
Post by dietspam16 on Mar 7, 2006 18:53:03 GMT -5
Ok, now I've got images of an asian anthropromorphic fish with an an old N64 rumble pack shoved into unmentionable places
|
|
|
Post by Monolith on Mar 9, 2006 0:13:19 GMT -5
There are no fish in the game, just in the title.
|
|
|
Post by Blues on Mar 9, 2006 2:58:48 GMT -5
what? how boring
|
|
|
Post by Arachis on Mar 9, 2006 8:30:56 GMT -5
seriously. I think that a sumo carp game would actually be really fun though. Alex, you should sell your idea to nintendo. That or eventually convince JP to make it if JP gets into the game industry.
|
|
|
Post by Random on Mar 9, 2006 10:49:50 GMT -5
no.
wouldn't sell
|
|
|
Post by Arachis on Mar 9, 2006 11:05:24 GMT -5
what do you mean it wouldnt sell? It would sell like crazy.
|
|
|
Post by Blues on Mar 9, 2006 12:00:46 GMT -5
I'd buy it
|
|
|
Post by Random on Mar 9, 2006 17:56:52 GMT -5
ok, all the idiots like terrance who either get high or act like they're high would buy a fish fighting game
anyone else would dismiss it as an incredibly stupid concept and never even touch it
hell it might sell a bit in japan but finding someone to fund it would be a bitch
|
|
|
Post by Arachis on Mar 9, 2006 17:58:12 GMT -5
People bought katamari damacy didnt they? I think that proves that sumo wrestling carp would sell perfectly.
|
|
|
Post by Random on Mar 9, 2006 18:39:16 GMT -5
thats completely different
you're operating under logic that stupidly assumes that one kind of "different" is the same as every other kind of "different"
|
|
|
Post by BlueDolphin on Mar 9, 2006 20:25:21 GMT -5
different being the same? Now I'm confused.
|
|
|
Post by dietspam16 on Mar 10, 2006 1:20:30 GMT -5
I think Katamari Damacy is a really good example. You can take a completely absurd and stupid idea for the basic setting and purpose of the game, but as long as you substantiate that with 1. Quality game play, the actual katamari game IS fun, without the lsd trip 2. A sense of the ridiculousness of what your doing, and an appreciation of that 3. Humour
|
|
|
Post by Random on Mar 10, 2006 2:33:03 GMT -5
ali's phrasing was absolutely stupid, though i think it captures exactly why its wrong
fish fighting each other would remain entertaining for 5 minutes tops
katamari damacy has replay value
see the difference? quality of game play, humor, and the sense of ridiculousness don't just guarantee a success, or even necessarily make it probable
|
|